01 · DIGITAL WORK
From a request to a finished body of work.
The agent carries code, research, files, decisions, and follow-through as one continuing assignment—not a collection of private chats.
THE OUTCOME
A reviewed, attributable outcome with every decision and artifact still connected to the work.
INTERACTIVE SIMULATION
A finished outcome, not another transcript.
Let the agent carry a commercial assignment through evidence and artifact creation, then enter for the one consequential decision.Supplier renewal
Owned by Procurement Agent · Accountable human assigned
Mission opened from the renewal calendar.
Responsibility and authority confirmed.
THE WORKPLACE COMES WITH YOU
Stay in the work.
Stay connected to your agents.
Your agents bring identity, files, memory, communication, and permissions into the same assignment. Spatial computing makes the connection fit your surroundings—from a focused screen to a brief spoken update. Your location never grants additional authority.
Explore the spatial experience Illustrative product scenarios. Integration availability depends on your deployment.THE AGENT CARRIES
Research and synthesize the context
Create and revise artifacts
Coordinate tools, files, and follow-ups
ITS HUMAN DECIDES
Set the objective and boundaries
Resolve tradeoffs and exceptions
Approve consequential delivery
ONE CONTINUING ASSIGNMENT
A day in the work.
Set the outcome
Define what must be true when the work is finished.
01Build the working context
Gather records, files, people, history, and available tools.
02Resolve one decision
Present the tradeoff with evidence; record the chosen path.
03Finish and follow through
Deliver the work, update every related record, and schedule what remains.
04Prepare a renewal that someone can actually decide on.
A customer renewal involves more than writing a convincing email. The account history, current agreement, delivery commitments, proposed terms, and people making the decision all need to agree. This scenario explores how one agent workplace could carry that assignment without asking its human to shuttle context between every tool.
Illustrative product scenario. These are proposed experience requirements, not a customer case study or a statement of current integration availability.
What goes into the assignment.
Give the agent the account, renewal date, permitted records, and the outcome you want: a recommendation with a draft proposal. Set who may see the work and which commercial decisions require review. The agent should distinguish an approved pricing rule from a colleague’s informal suggestion, and record missing information instead of filling the gap with a confident guess.
What a useful outcome contains.
The review package brings together the proposed terms, a comparison with the current agreement, supporting account evidence, and a draft message addressed to the right people. Open questions stay visible beside the recommendation. Once an authorized person approves delivery, the sent version and the next follow-up should remain attached to the assignment, so another colleague can pick it up without reconstructing the conversation.
An update that fits between meetings.
At a desk, compare the full proposal and its evidence. Walking between meetings, ask whether anything needs your attention and hear a short status. If the decision depends on reading a contract clause, the agent should hold it for a suitable review surface. Being available for a spoken update is different from being ready to approve a commitment.
When two records disagree.
Suppose the account notes promise a service that the signed agreement excludes. The agent should preserve both sources, explain the conflict, and ask the responsible person which commitment governs the proposal. Unaffected preparation can continue. A changed agreement should invalidate the affected draft rather than silently carry an earlier approval into a different offer.
Keep the relationship with its owner.
A useful starting assignment has accessible records, a clear reviewer, and an identifiable finished artifact. It does not require the agent to infer negotiating authority or decide what a relationship is worth. The goal is less coordination work around a considered decision; the customer relationship and commercial judgment remain with the people responsible for them.
What would make this useful for you?
Use these questions to evaluate one bounded piece of work in your own setting.
- Can the reviewer trace each material term to an approved rule, a source, or an explicit decision?
- When the source agreement changes, does the agent identify which recommendations need another review?
- Could a colleague continue the renewal from the saved outcome without reading the entire chat history?

WHY CONTINUITY MATTERS
Change the model or the computer tomorrow; the assignment, relationships, decisions, and history still belong to the same agent.
NEXT FIELD · SCIENTIFIC WORK
From a hypothesis to an attributable experiment.