Managed
Visca-operatedA dedicated environment operated for your team. Give your agents a place to work without having to operate every part of the suite yourself.
Your agents’ workplace.
On your terms.
At a company, inside a laboratory, or beside the equipment you rely on. Choose an operating environment that fits your work, while keeping the suite and the responsibilities together.
In the cloud
A shared environment accessible wherever you direct work.
Inside your network
The suite alongside the data and systems you already control.
Close to the work
Connect to local instruments and equipment within defined limits.
The environment changes.
The workplace stays together.
Define the same agent, shared context, and human authority across your deployment. Availability and integration requirements are confirmed as part of scoping.
- Agent identity and accountable ownership
- Email, calendar, files, memory, and shared work
- Permissions for models, tools, and connected systems
- A history of the work and the decisions behind it
- Human approval, intervention, and revocation
- Continuity as your environment and capabilities evolve
Start with your boundary.
Three approaches to discuss. The right choice depends on your data, connectivity, hardware, and operational requirements.
In your perimeter
Your infrastructurePlan an environment within your network. Define where identities, memory, files, credentials, and the work history are stored and who may access them.
Isolated
A deliberate boundaryFor laboratories, facilities, and sensitive systems, explore deployment without an outbound dependency. Local model, hardware, and integration requirements are part of the design.
Make the practical
decisions together.
Where the work lives
Decide which information must stay local and which approved services can participate.
What agents may do
Define access, budgets, review points, and who can pause or revoke authority.
How you operate it
Agree on integration, support, updates, retention, and recovery for your environment.
Start with one assignment you can evaluate.
A deployment discussion becomes more useful when it starts from a real piece of work and an explicit definition of done. This is a proposed evaluation path, not a fixed package or service commitment.
Illustrative design scenario
Scope a first evaluation
Choose a recurring assignment with a clear owner: prepare a meeting brief, assemble a weekly research review, or maintain the documentation for a project. Bring representative inputs, the systems involved, and an example of a good finished result. Include an awkward case, such as a missing source or a changed deadline, rather than choosing only the easiest run.
Next, separate preparation from consequences. Specify what the agent may read and draft, what it may change automatically, and what requires a decision. Identify the human who receives that decision and the person who can pause the work if they are unavailable. Decide whether a preview using copied or synthetic inputs is the right starting point.
Only then map the environment and integrations. Establish which connections are available, who operates them, and how failures become visible. At the end of the evaluation, review the finished work alongside the time people spent correcting, approving, and coordinating it. A successful demonstration should not conceal an impractical amount of supervision.
The evaluation produces a concrete scope, an observed outcome, unresolved requirements, and a decision about the next step. Wider access should follow evidence from that work, not the ambition of the initial brief.
The cases worth designing for.
Bring the material that makes success recognizable
Provide sample inputs, a target output, relevant constraints, and examples of unacceptable results. Redact or replace information that is not needed to evaluate the workflow. Assign someone who can judge the quality of the result.
Agree on operating responsibilities
Name the owners of access grants, updates, incident response, backups, and integration changes. Ask how the work behaves outside support hours and what the human sees when a dependency is unavailable.
Set a stopping and expansion rule
Define what would make you stop, revise, or extend the evaluation. Examples include unresolved external-action uncertainty, too much review effort, or a result that cannot be traced to its inputs. Avoid expanding scope before those questions are answered.
What to look for in an evaluation.
- What does done mean for this assignment, including its follow-up?
- Which capabilities are available today and which need integration or development?
- What evidence would justify giving the agent more responsibility?
One complete path.
Built around your work.
Bring an assignment and the environment it needs. We will work through the deployment and the human decisions with you.
Start a conversation