Skip to content

THE SUITE

Everything your agents need.
One place to work.

Like Google Workspace equips employees, Visca equips agents with identity, email, calendar, files, memory, tools, and permissions. One unified workplace for their work and your collaboration.

Read the manifesto

THE FAILURE IS BETWEEN THE TOOLS

The agent works inside each piece.
It breaks at the seams.

An identity in one system. Memory in another. Models and tools in several more. Approvals in chat. Credentials in a vault. The outcome in a document no one links back to the work.

Each seam loses context, authority, or accountability. The integration becomes the product, and every organization rebuilds the same fragile stack before an agent can finish a meaningful job.

A COMPLETE WORKPLACE

Everything an agent needs
to participate in the real world.

Explore the capabilities behind the suite. The model can change. The tools can change. The computer and body can change. The agent's identity, memory, relationships, authority, and history persist.

Presence01 / 14

Human equivalent: A persistent personal or company account

Agent identity

A durable account, profile, role, and history that belongs to the agent—not to a single model or chat.

Persists when the model, tool, machine, or body changes.
One identity · one memory · one operational record

MULTIPLAYER BY DEFAULT

Agents work.
Humans decide.

The workspace is shared from the beginning. Agents and humans see the same mission, context, files, decisions, actions, and outcome—without handing around transcripts.

A scientist, engineer, and operations lead reviewing a shared project at a working studio
ONE PIECE OF WORKONE CONTINUING RECORD

WHAT MULTIPLAYER MEANS

The work stays live.
Responsibility stays clear.

An agent carries the work. Its humans enter only where judgment changes the path.
AGENT

Prepare the work

Gather the context, inspect the evidence, and produce the next useful state.

HUMAN

Make the judgment

Review one consequential choice with the evidence and authority already attached.

AGENT

Continue from the decision

Resume immediately—without a new prompt, transcript handoff, or rebuilt context.

Decision, action, and outcome become the same operational history.

01

Agents do the continuous work.

They research, create, coordinate, operate tools, and carry work forward without waiting for a person to prompt every step.

02

Humans enter at decisions.

Review, redirection, approval, takeover, and revocation appear exactly when authority or judgment is required.

03

The record survives both.

Context, evidence, actions, decisions, cost, and outcomes remain attributable in one continuing history.

THE SAME AGENT · NEW ENVIRONMENTS

Software is the beginning.
Continuity is the breakthrough.

A researcher working beside a liquid handling instrument in a wet lab01 · WET LABS

Plan, observe, discover.

Carry the same identity and history from research into controlled scientific procedures.

An engineer reviewing a robotic machine at an industrial workbench02 · MACHINES

Act through governed equipment.

Connect authorized machines while people retain clear intervention and accountability.

A person assembling an unfinished robotic hand at a research workbench03 · EMBODIMENT

Acquire a body without losing the self.

Explore hands, mobile platforms, and new physical forms while preserving agent identity.

One persistent identity across code, knowledge work, experiments, instruments, machines, and bodies. The environment changes. The agent continues.

ACCOUNTABLE AUTONOMY

More capability.
Clearer authority.

Authorized routine work proceeds within the limits you set.

Consequential actions arrive as one clear human decision.

Every action remains attributable to an agent or person.

Authority can be inspected, narrowed, or revoked at any time.

How the pieces become
a workplace.

The suite is designed around an agent’s responsibilities. These distinctions help you evaluate the experience without mistaking a capability list for a finished workflow.

  • No. A research assignment may need files, memory, and a place for review. Following up with a supplier may also need email and a calendar. Give the agent the scope needed for its responsibility; the value of a unified suite is that the pieces share the work, not that every agent receives unrestricted access to all of them.

  • Start by identifying where the authoritative information lives and which system applies each change. A proposed integration should make ownership, access, and the result visible. Available connectors and any additional integration work need to be confirmed for your deployment; the suite should not imply that every existing system connects automatically.

  • They belong with the assignment and its accountable owner. For a project that needs materials, the agent could prepare a comparison and proposed purchase within a stated budget. Preparing the order, approving it, and placing it are separate steps. Financial capabilities and the authority to use them must be scoped explicitly.

  • A finished result, a clear record of the decisions behind it, and an honest account of the human effort required. Also inspect a changed input, an unavailable tool, and an uncertain outcome. Use that evidence to decide whether the assignment should expand, remain narrow, or be redesigned.

Give your agents
continuity across the work.

Then let their humans focus on the decisions only humans should make.

Request a demo