Visca

Solutions / Industry

Industrial autonomy

Engineers, operators, and AI inside one operating envelope—with live telemetry, human override, and every command recorded.Manufacturing and energy operations run hybrid fleets of software planners, PLCs, and physical machines — and the process recipes, yield data, and plant telemetry that move through them are trade-secret data that stays on the floor, off any vendor cloud. Today that means a stitched estate: planners on one platform, machines in vendor consoles, safety written into application code, audit scattered across clouds — assembled per line, per site, per vendor, and patched by whoever has time. Visca runs the estate as one stack inside your network — one identity model, one credential model, one runtime with safety envelopes, one record — with its own operators keeping every site current.
People and AI collaborating in a governed industrial autonomy workspace

Why this work needs a system boundary

Shared AI work is useful only when authority, data, and consequences remain controlled.

01

Configuration drift, site by site

Fleet configurations live in middleware configs, vendor consoles, and tribal knowledge. Two sites drift apart, and nobody can show a reviewer what's actually running at either one.

02

Safety as application code

Operational limits and interlocks are written into application logic, differently by every team. Auditing them is reading code, not reading a policy.

03

Incident reconstruction across vendors

When a line faults, telemetry is in one vendor's cloud, interventions in another log. Reconstructing the sequence takes days.

One shared workspace, not scattered agent threads

The collaboration and control plane around every participant, model, tool, and action.

01Identity

Attested machine identity

Each machine carries an attested identity. Commands are cryptographically attributable to a specific machine in a specific configuration.

02Credentials

Scoped authority over the line

A command to a machine runs on a scoped, time-bound credential — this machine, this operation, this window — not a standing connection from planner to floor.

03Runtime

Safety envelopes as policy, not code

Operational limits and interlocks — geofences, force limits, allowed operations — are enforced uniformly by the runtime across vendors. Auditing them is reading policy.

04Audit

One replayable incident timeline

Every planner decision, actuation, and operator intervention lands in one chained record. A line fault is reconstructed in minutes, not days.

05Operators

Every site current, without a per-site crew

The stack's own operators deploy, upgrade, patch, and rotate credentials across sites — recorded, so what's running at each site is answerable from the ledger, not from memory.

What the institution gets

Durable control without giving up capability.

  • Keep recipes, yields, and telemetry inside your own network
  • Enforce operational safety limits as auditable policy
  • Attribute every machine command cryptographically
  • Resident operators keep every site patched and current — recorded

In practice

A line-fault postmortem

A packaging line halts on a safety interlock. The postmortem is a replay of one record: the planner's command, the credential behind it, the attested machine identity, the envelope check that tripped, and the operator's reset — one timeline, across planner software and floor hardware, reconstructed in minutes. The fix ships through the resident operators, and the patch lands on the same record the postmortem cites.

Relevant control frameworks

SOC 2 Type IIIEC 62443 (industrial security)Functional-safety alignment

Other environments

Give AI a place on the team—and keep it under your control.

Give every AI a persistent identity, presence, and shared workspace. Collaborate live through our cloud or entirely on infrastructure you control.